Hackett Slams VAR as Fulham Edge 10-Man Chelsea in Fiery West London Derby
Fulham nicked a full-blooded west London derby 2-1, but the night was dominated by one flashpoint and a familiar debate: what’s the point of VAR if it can’t spot the obvious? Former PGMOL chief Keith Hackett was having none of it, insisting Chelsea’s Marc Cucurella should’ve conceded a penalty as well as the red card he did receive for hauling back Harry Wilson.
The flashpoint: DOGSO, VAR and a furious Chelsea
Chelsea actually started brightly at Craven Cottage, but the contest flipped when Harry Wilson burst clear and Marc Cucurella grabbed a handful of shirt. Referee Peter Bankes produced the red for denying an obvious goal-scoring opportunity, and amid the uproar he also flashed three quick yellows to protesting Blues. VAR checked it and backed the on-field call: free-kick outside the area and a dismissal for the Spaniard, with the Match Centre explaining the holding “did not continue into the penalty area.”
That last clause is exactly where Hackett drew his line in the sand. He believes the contact clearly carried on as Wilson entered the box and that the laws are crystal on what follows. If a defender’s holding starts outside and continues inside the area, it’s a penalty—end of discussion—and with holding not being an attempt to play the ball, the red still stands.
Hackett and Dean in step, law in the spotlight
Hackett backed Mike Dean’s take to the hilt, arguing the officiating team misapplied IFAB’s guidance on continuous holding. In short, the foul didn’t magically stop at the 18-yard line, so the consequence shouldn’t either. For Hackett, it should’ve been a spot-kick to Fulham and Cucurella walking—two truths that can, and should, coexist.
How the match was won
To Chelsea’s credit, they clung to 0-0 at the interval. But a man light eventually told. Raul Jimenez rose to nod Fulham ahead, only for Liam Delap to pounce with a sharp leveller that briefly re-ignited the away end. The relief didn’t last. The in-form Wilson, the game’s central figure, struck on 81 minutes to seal it. Fulham were ruthless when it mattered; Chelsea were left counting the cost of another rush of blood.
Chelsea’s discipline problem won’t go away
This was Chelsea’s fifth league red of the season—unsustainable for any side with top-half ambitions, never mind one trying to build under a new manager. Whether you side with Hackett or VAR on the location of the foul, the bigger picture is brutal: the Blues can’t keep eleven on the pitch, and it keeps undercutting decent spells of play.
FA Cup headache for Rosenior
The dismissal bites immediately. With suspensions carrying across domestic competitions, Cucurella is set to miss the FA Cup third-round tie at Charlton. It’s hardly ideal for Liam Rosenior, who watched from the stands at the Cottage and will take charge of Chelsea for the first time this weekend after succeeding Enzo Maresca. He left Under-21s coach Calum McFarlane to marshal the dugout again versus Fulham, citing travel and the lack of time to properly prepare the seniors after flying in from Strasbourg.
Pundit’s verdict
Did the officials get the letter of the law right? VAR said yes. Did they get the spirit right? Hackett says absolutely not—and he’s armed with the very wording that should’ve made it a penalty. For me, when you see the shirt being stretched into the area, you don’t split hairs—you point to the spot. Still, Fulham managed the chaos better and deserved their points, while Chelsea’s indiscipline remains their most dangerous opponent.
If you track the ebb and flow of form, odds, and controversy in the top flight, our guide to the best betting sites will keep you on the front foot all season.
